ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Self-skin Examination for Skin Cancer Detection in High-risk Populations: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study and Implications for Cancer Education.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeAquatic populations experience high cumulative ultraviolet radiation exposure and elevated skin cancer risk. Self-skin examination is widely promoted within cancer education strategies; however, its diagnostic accuracy in high-risk groups remains unclear.
methodAdults (≥ 18 years) participating in surfing or outdoor swimming (≥ 1 h/week) underwent full-body skin examination by an accredited skin cancer doctor. Prior to examination, participants identified any lesion(s) of concern, reflecting real-world self-detection. Suspicious lesions were biopsied or excised, with histopathology as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.
resultsAmong 191 participants (123 surfers, 68 swimmers), 50.8% were diagnosed with at least one skin cancer. Basal cell carcinoma was most common (n = 42), followed by melanoma (n = 26), SCC in situ (n = 17), and SCC (n = 3). Self-detection demonstrated modest sensitivity for BCC (69.0%) and melanoma (61.5%), with low specificity (~ 44-47%) and consistently low PPVs (< 30%). False-negative rates were substantial for BCC (31.0%), SCC in situ (41.2%), and melanoma (38.5%), indicating that many cancers were not self-recognized.
conclusionSelf-skin examination demonstrated limited diagnostic accuracy in high-risk aquatic populations. From a cancer education perspective, these findings suggest that self-examination may promote awareness but does not reliably support accurate lesion identification. Clinician-performed full-body skin examination remains essential for early detection. Cancer education for surfers and outdoor swimmers should therefore use self-examination to increase risk awareness and promote timely help-seeking, while emphasizing that the absence of a self-identified lesion does not exclude skin cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.