ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Bibliometric evaluation of research trends (1961-2025) in Clerodendrum species and their application in oncology.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This bibliometric analysis systematically charts the global research landscape of the genus Clerodendrum from 1961 to 2025, specifically investigating its evolving applications in oncology. Employing the Scopus and Web of Science databases under PRISMA guidelines, a merged dataset of 1298 broad and 51 specialized anticancer publications was analyzed using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix software. The findings reveal a marked transition from foundational botanical documentation to an exponential phase of pharmacological growth over the past decade, driven heavily by preclinical evaluations of Clerodendrum's rich flavonoids, terpenoids, and steroids. Geographically, research output is heavily centralized in Asia due to its rich ethnomedicinal heritage and immense botanical biodiversity, with India serving as the most prolific contributor (36.3% of total literature) and the Journal of Ethnopharmacology emerging as the primary publication venue. Current studies confirm that crude extracts and isolated phytochemicals induce anti-cancer activities by triggering apoptosis, inducing S and G2/M cell cycle arrest, modulating cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), and inhibiting cancer cell migration. Highly cited publications focus heavily on innovative nanomedicine design such as green-synthesized metal nanoparticles and isolating active molecules like apigenin. The thematic analysis demonstrates that while in vitro cytotoxicity screening is developed, advanced in vivo translation, systematic bioassay-guided isolation, and clinical efficacy data are severely deficient. The study concludes that standardizing dosage regimes, pursuing rigorous preclinical testing, and establishing plant tissue cultures to prevent wild over-harvesting are critical steps required to transform Clerodendrum into validated, multi-targeted oncological therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665692What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.