ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
In situ formation of hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents for ultrasound-assisted microextraction: a greener pathway for monitoring the migration and residue of polychlorinated biphenyls in food contact paper.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An environmentally friendly ultrasound-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction method based on the in situ formation of a hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent (DES) was developed for monitoring seven polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners as residues in and migrants from food contact paper. The extraction phase was generated in situ from tetrapropylammonium chloride and 1-octanol (molar ratio 1:3), followed by analyte quantification using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). Optimization of the parameters affecting extraction efficiency was performed. Under optimal conditions, the method exhibited good linearity and sensitivity. For residual PCB analysis, the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.093-0.11 mg/kg; relative recoveries ranged between 89 and 108%; and relative standard deviations were 4-8%. For migration studies, the LOQ was in the range of 0.47-0.53 μg/L, relative recoveries ranged between 90 and 110%, and relative standard deviations were under 9%. The developed method's intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations were 1.9-2.7% and 2.4-3.6%, respectively. The developed approach offers high extraction efficiency, operational simplicity, and environmental compatibility, demonstrating considerable promise for routine monitoring of PCBs in food contact paper materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.