ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2026
[Evaluation of the "interprofessional late shift" as elective subject in emergency medicine for medical students: a pilot study].
Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterprofessional teaching courses are generally considered useful but have rarely been implemented in German medical education curricula to date.
objectiveThe aim of this pilot study was to determine whether the newly planned teaching course "interprofessional late shift" improves students' attitudes towards interprofessional work and whether this can be further optimized by a short intervention at the beginning of the course. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe quantitative assessment involved students completing the "international socialization and valuing scale-9" (ISVS-9), the "University of the West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire German" (UWE-IP-D) (only the "communication and teamwork" dimension) and the scale for general self-efficacy expectations (SWE) before and after the course. In addition, a brief assessment of the personality was carried out before the event using the Big Five Inventory-10.
resultsThis pilot study was conducted over two semesters. Questionnaires were completed by 30 students. The ISVS‑9 total scores increased in both groups (p = 0.011); however, a significant difference in the increase between the intervention and control groups could not be determined (p = 0.98). The total scores of the UWE-IP‑D decreased significantly (p = 0.002), which indicates an improvement in communication skills. Analyses of the influence of the personality showed a significant correlation between the increase in self-efficacy, neuroticism (p = 0.018) and agreeableness (p = 0.044).
conclusionThe results of the pilot study clearly show that the newly planned teaching course "interprofesional late shift" could be an effective tool for enhancing medical students' appreciation of interprofessional collaboration; however, the appreciation could not be additionally improved by a short intervention at the beginning of the course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42665671What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.