Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665661›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Plasma p-tau217 as a two-cutoff approach to improve tau-PET screening and trial recruitment in Alzheimer's disease.

Yasaman Abtahi, Nikki Ghadiminia, Hamide Nasiri, Amir Jannesari Ladani, Kiana Naghavi Khanghah, Marjan Shamspour, Delsa Davashi Jamaloei, Fatemeh Sadat Meybodi, Saba Rahimi, Danial Hashemi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yasaman AbtahiDepartment of English Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
Nikki GhadiminiaSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Hamide NasiriStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Amir Jannesari LadaniDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran.
Kiana Naghavi KhanghahDepartment of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marjan ShamspourDepartment of Psychiatry, Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Afzalipour Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Delsa Davashi JamaloeiFaculty of Industrial Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh Sadat MeybodiDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Saba RahimiFaculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Danial HashemiDepartment of Medicine, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadreza SalehFaculty of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Negin AshooriDepartment of Medicine, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.
Shayan ShakeriDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. shayanshakeri98@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood-based biomarkers could broaden access to Alzheimer's disease diagnostics, but their ability to approximate tau PET, and to address gray-zone results, remains uncertain. We evaluated plasma p-tau217 against tau PET using a harmonized ADNI baseline cohort and an independently derived temporal meta-ROI tau-PET threshold. We included participants with complete baseline plasma biomarkers (p-tau217, Aβ42, Aβ40, NfL, GFAP), tau PET, and demographics, including: cognitively normal = 229, mild cognitive impairment = 149, and Alzheimer's disease dementia = 41. ROC analyses assessed discrimination of tau-PET positivity overall and by diagnostic group. A two-cutoff strategy was implemented to minimize indeterminate classifications. Across the pooled cohort, p-tau217 demonstrated the strongest ability to discriminate tau-PET status (AUC 0.671, 95% CI 0.597-0.746), outperforming Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ42/Aβ40; Though overall accuracy remained moderate and performance differed based on diagnosis, with AUCs of 0.785 for Alzheimer's disease dementia and lower values for cognitively normal and mild cognitive impairment. The two-cutoff approach substantially reduced intermediate classifications compared with conventional markers. In ADNI, plasma p-tau217 showed the highest discriminative performance among the single blood biomarker for detecting tau-PET positivity, showing moderate accuracy overall and its strongest performance in Alzheimer's disease dementia. A two-cutoff approach substantially reduces gray-zone classifications, supporting p-tau217 as a primary screening tool before confirmatory imaging. Further work and validation are needed across different groups.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseasePositron-Emission Tomographytau ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleROC CurveAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersMAPT protein, humantau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseBlood-based biomarkersPlasma p-tau217Tau-PETTwo-cutoff strategy

Identifiers

PMID42665661
PMCPMC13524928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.