ArticleScientific reports2026
Plasma p-tau217 as a two-cutoff approach to improve tau-PET screening and trial recruitment in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers could broaden access to Alzheimer's disease diagnostics, but their ability to approximate tau PET, and to address gray-zone results, remains uncertain. We evaluated plasma p-tau217 against tau PET using a harmonized ADNI baseline cohort and an independently derived temporal meta-ROI tau-PET threshold. We included participants with complete baseline plasma biomarkers (p-tau217, Aβ42, Aβ40, NfL, GFAP), tau PET, and demographics, including: cognitively normal = 229, mild cognitive impairment = 149, and Alzheimer's disease dementia = 41. ROC analyses assessed discrimination of tau-PET positivity overall and by diagnostic group. A two-cutoff strategy was implemented to minimize indeterminate classifications. Across the pooled cohort, p-tau217 demonstrated the strongest ability to discriminate tau-PET status (AUC 0.671, 95% CI 0.597-0.746), outperforming Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ42/Aβ40; Though overall accuracy remained moderate and performance differed based on diagnosis, with AUCs of 0.785 for Alzheimer's disease dementia and lower values for cognitively normal and mild cognitive impairment. The two-cutoff approach substantially reduced intermediate classifications compared with conventional markers. In ADNI, plasma p-tau217 showed the highest discriminative performance among the single blood biomarker for detecting tau-PET positivity, showing moderate accuracy overall and its strongest performance in Alzheimer's disease dementia. A two-cutoff approach substantially reduces gray-zone classifications, supporting p-tau217 as a primary screening tool before confirmatory imaging. Further work and validation are needed across different groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.