ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-guided residual learning for phase-aware UAV trajectory prediction in urban environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and accurate trajectory prediction is critical for the safe and efficient operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in complex urban environments, where flight dynamics are subject to wind disturbances, dense obstacle fields, and strongly phase-dependent behavior. Conventional physics-based approaches are limited by parameter uncertainty, simplifying assumptions, and unmodeled disturbances, while data-driven models may lack physical plausibility and robustness across different flight phases. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a physics-guided hybrid residual-correction framework for UAV trajectory prediction. The approach combines a physics-based model with a data-driven sequence model and learns a residual correction that compensates for the deviation between analytical prediction and observed flight behavior. In addition, the model is trained with physics-guided feasibility regularization to promote realistic speed, acceleration, jerk, and landing descent behavior. Experimental evaluation on a real-world test set shows that the proposed method yields improved results relative to the stand-alone physics model, the LSTM model, and an MLP-based fusion model across all major metrics, including RMSE, MAE, ADE, and FDE. Phase-wise analysis further demonstrates strong improvements in cruise and landing, while highlighting takeoff as the most challenging phase. The results indicate that combining physical structure with learned residual correction provides a more accurate, physically consistent, and operationally interpretable approach for UAV trajectory forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.