Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665625›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2026

Interpreting oral microbiome research in clinical dentistry: terminology, limitations and clinical implications.

Kitty Guo, David Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kitty GuoUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. kguo001@dundee.ac.uk.
David EdwardsUniversity of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context The oral cavity hosts the second most diverse microbiome in the human body; a complex ecosystem interacting with the host across multiple distinct ecological niches. Advances in sequencing abilities have transformed our understanding of the oral microbiome, but significant conceptual and methodological challenges remain.Objectives This review explores the terminology that underpins microbiome research highlighting ambiguity and heterogeneity among current research and the challenges that arise when translating oral microbiome research to clinical dentistry.Current knowledge While associations between oral microorganisms, oral microbial communities and both oral and systemic disease are increasing, current microbiome analyses alone cannot yet account for a number of important factors including host response, functional variation and strain level differences that determine pathogenic potential.Conclusion A future with the ability to use microbiome analyses for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes requires careful hypothesis-driven research with a combined multi-omics approach.

Indexed as

Dental ResearchDentistryMicrobiotaMouthTerminology as TopicHumans

Identifiers

PMID42665625
PMCPMC13524789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.