ReviewBritish dental journal2026
Interpreting oral microbiome research in clinical dentistry: terminology, limitations and clinical implications.
Review in British dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context The oral cavity hosts the second most diverse microbiome in the human body; a complex ecosystem interacting with the host across multiple distinct ecological niches. Advances in sequencing abilities have transformed our understanding of the oral microbiome, but significant conceptual and methodological challenges remain.Objectives This review explores the terminology that underpins microbiome research highlighting ambiguity and heterogeneity among current research and the challenges that arise when translating oral microbiome research to clinical dentistry.Current knowledge While associations between oral microorganisms, oral microbial communities and both oral and systemic disease are increasing, current microbiome analyses alone cannot yet account for a number of important factors including host response, functional variation and strain level differences that determine pathogenic potential.Conclusion A future with the ability to use microbiome analyses for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes requires careful hypothesis-driven research with a combined multi-omics approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.