ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel DIO optimized sigmoid-activated 2DOF-PID controller for robust control of magnetic levitation systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the classical testbeds in control engineering, magnetic levitation systems occupy a prominent place owing to their strongly nonlinear character and intrinsic open-loop instability. Stabilizing a freely suspended ferromagnetic object requires careful regulation of the electromagnetic force, which makes these systems particularly demanding for controller design. To address this challenge, the present work introduces a sigmoid-activated two-degree-of-freedom PID (SA-2DOF-PID) controller, wherein a sigmoid-based nonlinear term is embedded within a standard 2DOF-PID architecture. This integration yields smoother actuation signals and increases overall closed-loop robustness. Controller parameter selection is carried out via the dholes-inspired optimization (DIO) algorithm, a recently proposed nature-inspired method. A multi-objective fitness function incorporating peak overshoot, settling time, and cumulative tracking error guides the tuning procedure. Simulation experiments performed under both nominal plant conditions and deliberate parametric perturbations serve to assess the proposed scheme. Quantitative comparisons against secant optimization algorithm (SOA)-, honey badger algorithm (HBA)-, and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based controllers reveal that the DIO-tuned SA-2DOF-PID achieves markedly lower overshoot, quicker settling, and higher steady-state precision. Robustness evaluations involving intentional variations in system parameters further confirm that the closed-loop behavior remains well-damped with only marginal deterioration. Additional benchmarking against whale optimization algorithm combined with simulated annealing (WOA-SA)-based proportional-integral-derivative (PID), opposition-based artificial electric field algorithm (ObAEF)-based fractional-order PID (FOPID), and manta ray foraging optimization (MRFO)-based real PID with second-order derivative (RPIDD²) controllers corroborates the practical advantages of the proposed approach. Taken together, the study demonstrates that the SA-2DOF-PID framework tuned by DIO constitutes an effective, structurally lean, and computationally tractable strategy for managing nonlinear and open-loop unstable plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.