Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665582›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Learning precise segmentation of neurofibrillary tangles from rapid manual point annotations.

Sina Ghandian, Liane Albarghouthi, Kiana Nava, Shivam R Rai Sharma, Lise Minaud, Laurel Beckett, Naomi Saito, Charles DeCarli, Robert A Rissman, Andrew F Teich and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital neuropathology of neurodegenerative disorders: Foundations, research advances, and future directions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  3. Comparison of multiple quantitative strategies for neuropathologic image analyses.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sina GhandianInstitute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Liane AlbarghouthiInstitute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Kiana NavaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Shivam R Rai SharmaDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Lise MinaudInstitute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Laurel BeckettDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Naomi SaitoDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Charles DeCarliDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Robert A RissmanDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.
Andrew F TeichDepartment of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research On Alzheimer's Disease and Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lee-Way JinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Brittany N DuggerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. bndugger@health.ucdavis.edu.
Michael J KeiserInstitute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. keiser@keiserlab.org.

Funding

Satellite Diagnostic and Treatment Clinic CoreP50AG008702 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 1989 to 2019
$46.3M
UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30P30AG062429 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Mark W Bondi · 2019 to 2026
$34.9M
Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Miguel Arce · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072972 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Charles DeCarli, Rachel A Whitmer · 2021 to 2026
$25.2M
The Neuropathologic Landscape of Alzheimer's Disease in Hispanic DecedentsR01AG062517 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Brittany Nicole Dugger · 2019 to 2026
$10.5M
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF2018-191905 (https://doi.org/10.37921/550142lkcjzw)NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062429NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS P30AG072972NIA NIH HHS P50 AG008702NIA NIH HHS P50AG008702NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062517NIA NIH HHS R01AG062517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulation of abnormal tau protein into neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) is a pathologic hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD). Accurate detection of NFTs in tissue samples can reveal relationships with clinical, demographic, and genetic features through deep phenotyping. However, expert manual analysis is time-consuming, subject to observer variability, and cannot handle the data amounts generated by modern imaging. We present a scalable, open-source, deep-learning approach to quantify NFT burden in digital whole slide images (WSIs) of post-mortem human brain tissue. To achieve this, we developed a method to generate detailed NFT boundaries directly from single-point-per-NFT annotations. We then trained a semantic segmentation model on 45 annotated 2400 μm by 1200 μm regions of interest (ROIs) selected from 15 unique temporal cortex WSIs of AD cases from three institutions (University of California (UC)-Davis, UC-San Diego, and Columbia University). Segmenting NFTs at the single-pixel level, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.832 and an F1 of 0.527 (196-fold over random) on a held-out test set of 664 NFTs from 20 ROIs (7 WSIs). We compared this to deep object detection, which achieved comparable but coarser-grained performance that was 60% faster. The segmentation and object detection models correlated well with expert semi-quantitative scores at the whole-slide level (Spearman's rho ρ = 0.654 (p = 6.50e-5) and ρ = 0.513 (p = 3.18e-3), respectively). We openly release this multi-institution deep-learning pipeline to provide detailed NFT spatial distribution and morphology analysis capability at a scale otherwise infeasible by manual assessment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeurofibrillary TanglesBrainHumanstau Proteinstau ProteinsAlzheimer diseaseDeep learningDigital pathologyNeurofibrillary tanglesNeuropathologyNFTObject detectionOpen sourceSemantic segmentationTau

Identifiers

PMID42665582
PMCPMC13524952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.