ArticleeNeuro2026
Kinematics-Based Assessment of Reaching and Grasping Movements in LRN Ablated Animals Identifies a Role for the LRN in Endpoint Stabilization and Reach Timing.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) is positioned to relay motor-related information to cerebellar circuits, but its direct contribution to skilled reaching and grasping remains unclear. Here, we examined skilled forelimb behavior in intact adult female Long-Evans rats after bilateral, cell type-targeted LRN ablation using single-pellet reaching, qualitative scoring, and quantitative three-dimensional kinematic analysis. We assessed whether LRN loss disrupted gross limb transport, endpoint precision, trial-to-trial consistency, and reach timing across pre- and post-surgical recording sessions. LRN-ablated animals continued to generate broadly recognizable pellet-directed reaches, indicating that the LRN is not required for basic reach production. However, group differences emerged in restricted portions of the reach trajectory and were most prominent in pellet-directed endpoint control. Experimental animals showed broader endpoint covariance, greater endpoint spread, and increased trial-to-trial variability, indicating less precise and less reproducible forelimb placement relative to the pellet. These effects were not explained by a single fixed spatial offset, but instead reflected reduced endpoint stabilization accompanied by selective coordinate-specific changes, including altered paw height. Reach duration was also altered, but these timing differences emerged later and were less prominent than the spatial endpoint deficits. Together, these findings suggest that the LRN contributes primarily to the refinement, stabilization, and timing of skilled forelimb movements rather than to gross reach initiation or limb transport. This work provides a direct in vivo model for studying LRN-dependent control of skilled reaching and highlights the value of kinematic analysis for detecting subtle movement deficits beyond retrieval success alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.