ArticleeNeuro2026
Biased Inter-columnar Communication and Short-Term Plasticity in Mouse Barrel Cortex.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Each barrel of the barrel cortex (BC) receives thalamic input primarily from a single whisker. Barrels then communicate through intracortical circuitry to integrate input from multiple whiskers and perform processing functions such as spatial filtering, motion sensing, and object localization. To investigate the circuits that enable barrels to communicate independently of extracortical and inter-areal influences, we prepared slices of somatosensory cortex from mice of both sexes with a hybrid voltage sensor (hVOS) targeted to Scnn1a excitatory neurons in cortical layer 4 (L4). We then imaged voltage responses of this population of neurons to electrical stimulation. Imaging tracked activity initiated in L4 of one barrel spreading into layer 2/3 (L2/3) and then to L4 of neighboring barrels. AMPA receptor blockade eliminated this spread, suggesting that L4 signaling to neighboring barrels employs an L4→L2/3→L4 excitatory synaptic relay. Blocking AMPA receptors also enhanced some responses, revealing intra- and inter-barrel feedforward inhibition. Both coronal and sagittal slices presented the layout of barrels, which aligned with facial whisker organization. We assessed inter-barrel communication in different directions and found it to be isotropic in response amplitude, half-width, and conduction velocity. However, latency was longest for communication to caudal barrels. Furthermore, paired-pulse depression was strongest and recovery slowest for inter-barrel communication related to exploratory protraction. Such biases have the potential to contribute to direction-sensitive processing. Anisotropy in short-term plasticity can tune BC microcircuits to preserve temporal fidelity and filter selectively according to direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.