ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
CT-guided Preoperative Localization of Impalpable Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison Between Two Devices.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimTo compare two different devices for computed tomography (CT)-guided preoperative localization of impalpable pulmonary nodules in terms of effectiveness, technical and clinical success and complications rate. PATIENTS AND
methodsCT-guided preoperative localization procedures of small or ground glass (
resultsEighty-five consecutive patients (46/39 males/female; mean age 42 years, range=4-80 years) with 85 pulmonary nodules (maximum diameter: 8.5±6.4 mm in the SpW group and 17.0±4.2 mm in the HyP group) underwent preoperative CT-guided localization with SpW (65/85, 76.5%) or HyP (20/85, 23.5%) device. Correct CT-guided landmark positioning was obtained in 100% of cases. VATS revealed 4/65 (6.2%) cases of marker displacement in the SpW group and 3/17 (17.6%) cases in the HyP group (
conclusionBoth markers are effective for the preoperative localization of impalpable pulmonary nodules in VATS. SpW seems to be slightly more stable and safer than HyP lung marker in relation to the displacement and PH rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.