Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665349›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Newly graduated nurses' first-year work experiences in Turkey: a qualitative study on reality shock and professional adaptation.

Asena Köse, Gülay İpek Çoban, Melisa Kapot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asena KöseDepartment of Fundamentals of Nursing, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey asena.erge@atauni.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0003-2231-4783
Gülay İpek ÇobanDepartment of Fundamentals of Nursing, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Melisa KapotAtatürk University Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to examine newly graduated nurses' first-year work experiences, their coping processes in response to reality shock and their perceptions of professional adaptation.

designThis study employed a descriptive phenomenological design.

settingThe study was conducted in a university hospital in Turkey between October 2024 and March 2025.

participantsThe participants consisted of 10 new graduate nurses working in clinical units including emergency departments, intensive care units and medical and surgical services. Participants were selected using purposive sampling based on predefined inclusion criteria.

resultsThe study identified three main themes: 'Reality Shock and Professional Challenges', 'Adaptation and Coping Process' and 'Professional Development and Job Satisfaction'. Participants experienced reality shock due to the theory-practice gap, heavy workload, fear of mistakes, communication problems and insufficient support. Support from experienced nurses, peer support and coping strategies facilitated adaptation, while increasing clinical experience improved professional competence, self-confidence and job satisfaction.

conclusionsIt is evident that the transition process for newly graduated nurses involves not only the development of clinical skills but also intense psychosocial adaptation processes. It is believed that structured orientation programmes, mentor support and supportive work environments can strengthen new graduate nurses' professional adaptation processes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalJob SatisfactionNursesNursing Staff, HospitalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCoping SkillsFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchTurkeyWorkloadHealthNursing researchQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID42665349
PMCPMC13536062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.