ArticleBMJ open2026
Health-system burden of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in England: a literature-based micro-cost analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo quantify the per-patient-per-month (PPPM) cost for each phase of care in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and the overall cost of a base-case (illustrative) non-curative management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS in England.
designWe conducted a retrospective, literature-based, micro-costing analysis from the National Health Service (NHS) England provider perspective using published sources and publicly available price lists. No individual-patient data were used. Based on literature, a base-case management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS was defined as a diagnostic work-up at month 0, 12 cycles of azacitidine (given for 7 days in each 28-day cycle), 5 months of post-hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure supportive care and 1 month of terminal care.
settingHealthcare resource utilisation was analysed for adults with HR-MDS who received first-line azacitidine in routine practice if cycle-level or phase-level transfusion and admission rates were reported in the literature. Patients who required allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or whose HR-MDS transformed to acute myeloid leukaemia were excluded because the diagnostic and/or therapeutic pathways differ. Unit costs for 2024/2025 were taken from published English national sources and an English trust tariff.
resultsPPPM costs were £8721.58 during active azacitidine therapy, £5399.58 after HMA failure and £12 554.58 for hospital-dominant terminal care; a one-off diagnostic work-up with genomics cost £2710 to £2810. The total cost for the base-case management pathway was £146 921 per patient. An alternative pathway excluding genomic testing and assuming hospice-dominant terminal care reduced the total cost to approximately £136 840 to £140 990, depending on whether the lower or upper bound of hospice bed-day costs is applied.
conclusionsThe direct NHS-provider cost burden of this non-curative HR-MDS management pathway is concentrated in azacitidine acquisition and administration during active treatment, transfusions and admissions after HMA failure and setting-dependent costs at the end of life. The total cost for the illustrative management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS (£146 921) is of a similar order to the estimate in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence technology appraisal for azacitidine uprated to £124 848 for 2024/2025. This comparison is provided for context only and should not be interpreted as validation of the present model, given differences in population, model structure, treatment duration and price year. The phase-specific PPPM estimates can inform, subject to local validation and scenario testing, UK budget-impact analyses, service planning and future economic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.