Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42665341›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Virtual reality to aid recovery from critical illness: a feasibility trial of a rehabilitation intervention co-developed with key stakeholders.

Ceri Lynch, Sarah Gill, Cheney J G Drew, Michelle Smalley, Ceri Battle, Katherine Cullen, Craig Greenstock, Kim Smallman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ceri LynchCritical Care, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-6259-6126
Sarah GillResearch and Development, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Abercynon, UK.
Cheney J G DrewCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK drewc5@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4397-6252
Michelle SmalleyCritical Care, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.
Ceri BattlePhysiotherapy Department, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7503-1931
Katherine CullenSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3704-4598
Craig GreenstockPPI Representative, Pontypridd, UK.
Kim SmallmanCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved survival from critical illness has led to an increase in patients with long-term physical and psychological morbidity. Postintensive care rehabilitation services are variable and it is recognised that there is a need for inclusive and accessible interventions to support recovery after critical illness. We engaged with people with lived experience of critical care admission to co-produce a virtual reality mediated intervention (ViRtual REality to AiD recoverY post intensive care unit (ICU) (VR READY).

objectivesOur primary objective was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of VR READY to improve the patient experience during recovery from critical illness. Secondary objective

designThe co-developed intervention (VR READY) was evaluated in a single arm, non-randomised feasibility trial with embedded process evaluation in patients leaving critical care.

settingDistrict General Hospital in Wales.

participantsAdults who had been admitted to an ICU requiring organ support for more than 48 hours during their current hospital admission. Patients were approached at the point of stepping down from the ICU to a general ward (±48 hours). 87 patients were screened for eligibility, 37 were approached and 22 participants were recruited.

interventionParticipants were asked to use VR READY for at least 5 min per day for 14 days. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was feasibility defined by prespecified criteria. Secondary outcomes prioritised by patients and pertaining to recovery and well-being were assessed at baseline and 14 days. A qualitative interview was conducted 4-6 weeks later.

results22 participants were recruited with 91% completion of baseline measures, 49.5% completion at 14-day follow-up and 27.3% completing the qualitative interview. Intervention adherence was poor (37.9%), however qualitative findings suggested that participants that engaged with the intervention considered VR READY beneficial to their recovery. While feasibility criteria were met for recruitment and data completion, criteria for retention and intervention adherence were not.

conclusionsCritical illness is a traumatic experience. Our co-developed rehabilitation intervention VR READY was not feasible in its current format, potentially as a result of being offered too early in recovery when patients were struggling with fatigue, motivation and resilience. VR READY may be beneficial to recovery but further research is needed into optimal mode and timing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN88854487.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessVirtual RealityAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedWalesAdult intensive & critical carePsychological StressQuality of LifeRehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID42665341
PMCPMC13536039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.