ReviewJornal brasileiro de nefrologia
The new era of treatments for kidney transplant recipients.
Review in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite substantial improvements in short-term outcomes after kidney transplantation, important unmet clinical needs persist. These include expanding transplant access for highly sensitized candidates, mitigating the short- and long-term consequences of ischemia-reperfusion injury, preventing acute rejection while preserving allograft function, minimizing off-target toxicities associated with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens, improving adherence to long-term immunosuppressive therapy, and developing effective treatments for late antibody-mediated rejection. A growing pipeline of novel therapeutic agents aims to address these challenges by targeting key immunologic and injury pathways that contribute to allograft dysfunction and failure. In this review, we examine emerging pharmacologic strategies currently undergoing clinical evaluation in these domains and critically assess their potential to improve long-term graft survival and patient outcomes. We also discuss the key considerations and priorities that should inform future clinical investigation in kidney transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.