Trial reportSchizophrenia research2026
Relationships between empathy, symptoms, and functioning in first episode psychosis.
Trial report in Schizophrenia research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social cognitive difficulties among those with schizophrenia and first episode psychosis (FEP) are well-documented, but less research has investigated the social cognitive construct of empathy. Empathy has been linked in schizophrenia samples to symptoms and functioning, but minimal work has examined empathy among those with FEP. This study examined associations between empathy, symptoms, and functioning in FEP participants, as well as whether empathy accounts for unique variance in these constructs over and above other social cognitive measures. Participants were 100 people with FEP who were taking part in a larger randomized controlled trial. Two empathy measures, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE), were administered at baseline, along with measures of symptoms, functioning, and other social cognitive constructs. Results revealed that greater empathy, measured by the IRI, was linked to less severe negative symptoms across multiple domains, while fewer associations were evident for positive symptoms and functioning. Across tested domains, empathy significantly predicted clinical outcomes over and above other social cognitive constructs. However, both empathy measures displayed low internal consistency. Taken together, results suggest that empathy may be important to consider in FEP populations, particularly as it relates to negative symptoms, and empathy predicts unique variance in multiple clinical characteristics. Future work should focus on improving empathy measurement approaches and examining empathy in tandem with broader social cognitive batteries among FEP samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.