Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42664331›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Mental bootstrapping enables human-level concept learning in self-supervised deep models.

Lingxiao Yang, Muyang Lyu, Ying-Jie Wang, Xiaohua Xie, Zonglei Zhen, Jian-Huang Lai, Ru-Yuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lingxiao YangSchool of Systems Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8642-9614
Muyang LyuPeking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-5138-3155
Ying-Jie WangBrain Health Institute, National Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and School of Psychology, Shanghai 200030, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-5703-1724
Xiaohua XieSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0310-4679
Zonglei ZhenBeijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6748-6434
Jian-Huang LaiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Ru-Yuan ZhangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-715X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How agents acquire abstract concepts from sparse, diverse examples-often without explicit supervision-remains a central problem in cognitive science and artificial intelligence. Human studies suggest that this ability depends on mental bootstrapping, the gradual construction of complex concepts from simpler partial structures. Building on this idea, we develop a self-supervised framework that trains models on systematically simplified versions of abstract reasoning tasks containing incomplete but structured concept cues. This algorithm enables models to form internal abstractions under limited resources and later apply them to more complex problems. We evaluate the framework across 12 abstract visual reasoning datasets testing in-distribution concept induction, out-of-distribution generalization, and few-shot learning. To contextualize performance, we also measure human accuracy on the same tasks. Models trained on simplified problems generalize robustly, reaching or even surpassing human-level performance. These findings show that abstract reasoning can emerge from structured simplification and minimal data, offering a computational account of concept learning in humans and machines.

Indexed as

Concept FormationDeep LearningLearningSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID42664331
PMCPMC13524018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.