ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Impact of Concomitant Cervical Anterolisthesis on Surgical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignMulticenter prospective cohort study.ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine whether concomitant cervical anterolisthesis influences surgical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).MethodsA total of 691 CSM patients were enrolled and classified into those with anterolisthesis ≥ 2 mm (Slip group, n=95) and those without measurable slip (Non-slip group, n=596). Patients underwent surgical treatment as indicated and were followed for 2 years. Cervical alignment, C2-7 ROM, JOA scores, JOACMEQ domains, and SF-36 scores were assessed. Clinical outcomes were compared using multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline factors. A subgroup analysis evaluated high-grade slip (≥4 mm).ResultsThe Slip group was older and had more kyphosis and worse baseline lordosis and JOA score. Fusion was performed more frequently in the Slip group, which also showed a greater reduction in cervical ROM at 2 years. Adjusted postoperative JOA score, JOACMEQ, and SF-36 outcomes were comparable between groups postoperatively. Within the Slip group, high-grade slip (≥4 mm) was associated with less JOA improvement in an exploratory subgroup analysis, whereas JOACMEQ and SF-36 scores were not influenced by slip severity.ConclusionsNeutral-radiograph-defined cervical anterolisthesis ≥2 mm was not independently associated with worse adjusted 2-year neurological, functional, or quality-of-life outcomes. High-grade slip (≥4 mm), however, may limit neurological recovery, underscoring the importance of evaluating segmental stability when substantial slippage is present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.