ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Understanding the Research Needs and Educational Methods of Surgeons to Help Guide Future Spine Deformity Research: A Survey of AO Spine Members.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignCross-sectional survey.ObjectiveOutcomes research has significantly shaped patient management in spine deformity care, while the dissemination of research remains a challenge. To guide future research directions, this study surveyed AO Spine members to identify the research needs, dissemination methods, and existing knowledge gaps.MethodsAn anonymous, English-language survey containing 40 questions explored knowledge gaps, research priorities, and knowledge translation practices. Distributed via email to AO Spine members globally, the questionnaire collected responses from March 20 to April 14, 2025.Results399 responses were received from mostly orthopedic surgeons, 28% from Asia Pacific, 27% from Europe and South Africa, 18% from Latin America, 16% from North America, and 11% from the Middle East and North Africa. Of the 279 respondents focused on deformity surgery, most utilized classification tools, clinical guidelines, and multicenter study findings for decision-making. However, over half were unaware of past Knowledge Forum Deformity resources, indicating a dissemination gap. Key sources of information were publications, conferences, and AO Spine courses. Major barriers to implementing new tools included workflow integration and administrative challenges. Top research priorities were the development of diagnostic and treatment guidelines (71%) and prediction algorithms (69%). Prominent knowledge gaps included proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (69%), spinal alignment guidelines (54%), and osteoporosis management (52%).ConclusionThe survey highlights PJK, spinal alignment, and osteoporosis as the leading knowledge gaps. Priorities for future research include developing guidelines and prediction tools. Improved dissemination strategies are needed to enhance clinical adoption and inform ongoing research and education initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.