Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42664285›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Community perspectives on the Zambian Farm Block Development Program and an evaluation of household income factors: Lessons from Kawambwa district.

Obed Chanda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Obed ChandaDepartment of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Mansa, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-3208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2002, the Farm Block Development Program was one of the flagship initiatives within Zambia's agricultural policy. This program was designed to promote commercialization of rural agricultural lands, to contribute to national food security, economic growth, and improved rural livelihoods. However, host community concerns remained untold. This paper aimed at shedding light on those concerns, and the factors associated with household incomes. A qualitative evaluation of submissions from Luena Farm Block residents in Kawambwa district in Zambia, showed that reticent project reception; fears of displacement, job scarcity, environmental damage, and cultural erosion were major issues for the local community. Further, a quantitative evaluation of data from 5286 respondents, using Tobit models established that 95% of household incomes were below Zambia's official minimum wage, and the rural average income. Censored Least Absolute Deviation regression revealed that the household income factors were education, household size, cultivated area, and land tenure security. Environment-level income factors were health facility presence, and water access. The conclusion urged a cautious approach to achieve sustainable farm block development. Policy recommendations were that community needs and interests should be mainstreamed in the Farm Block Development Program. Education and health facilities should be promoted to enhance literacy and productivity. Mechanization should be promoted to expand crop areas and production efficiency. Land tenure security should be facilitated to protect fixed investments. Safe water access should be promoted to support irrigation and public health.

Indexed as

AgricultureFarmsIncomeFamily CharacteristicsHumansRural PopulationZambia

Identifiers

PMID42664285
PMCPMC13524339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.