ArticlePloS one2026
Optimizing the location of point-of-care infant HIV testing devices in Zimbabwe to maximize impact and value: A modeling analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly HIV diagnosis in infants is essential for timely antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation, but requires virologic testing - often performed in centralized laboratories, which can delay results and treatment initiation. Point-of-care (POC) testing delivers same-day results, facilitating prompt diagnosis and treatment, but availability is limited in low-resource settings. We aimed to optimally locate POC machines to improve life expectancy (LE) and net health benefit (NHB) for infants born to people with HIV in Zimbabwe.
methodsWe linked the validated CEPAC-Pediatric HIV microsimulation model, populated with detailed subnational programmatic data, with a location-optimization model for 122 clinics in Matabeleland South's 7 districts. Simulating two testing strategies - conventional laboratory-based and POC machine-based - we projected: 30-day result-return, 30-day ART initiation for children with HIV (CWH), LE, HIV-related healthcare costs, and NHB. We maximized LE or NHB for infants tested at 6-10 weeks old.
findingsWith 17 POC devices in current locations, a projected 43.8% of tested infants would receive HIV test results, with 41.6% of CWH starting ART within 30 days. Undiscounted LE would be 67.85 years (25.91 among CWH), with average discounted lifetime costs of $202/infant. Optimizing locations to maximize LE would retain 6 devices in current locations and move 11 to new sites, leading to projected 52.6% 30-day result-return, 50.0% 30-day ART initiation, and 67.88 years LE (27.04 among CWH), costing $211/infant. Maximizing NHB with a willingness-to-pay threshold ≥ $1,164 (66% of Zimbabwe's GDP per capita) would render the same optimal locations as maximizing LE. Additional optimally-located machines would further improve LE. Ensuring one machine per district while maximizing LE would require one additional machine and would increase 30-day result-return (to 53.3%), ART initiation (to 50.6%), and LE (to 67.88 years, 27.11 for CWH), costing $212/infant.
interpretationData-driven optimization of POC machine location could improve HIV detection and increase life expectancy and net health benefit for infants undergoing HIV testing in Zimbabwe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.