ArticlePloS one2026
Data-intelligence-driven flood forecasting and early warning in a small river basin: A BiLSTM model integrated with the "631" response mechanism.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable flood forecasts must be translated into timely, accountable warnings, particularly in small mountainous basins with short concentration times and limited historical records. This study links a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) rainfall-runoff model with Jiangxi Province's hierarchical "631" response mechanism. Twenty flood events from the Xiangshui River Basin were divided chronologically into 14 training events and six independent test events. The final network contains four stacked BiLSTM layers and a fully connected output layer; it does not contain convolutional or pooling layers. Against LSTM, GRU and Xin'anjiang baselines, BiLSTM obtained a mean Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.90 and a mean denormalised RMSE of 11.2 m3/s. All six paired NSE differences favoured BiLSTM, but the small test set precludes confirmatory statistical inference; results are therefore reported with event-level differences and leave-one-event-out sensitivity rather than interpreted from the Wilcoxon p-value alone. SHAP marginal attribution identified Qingxi, Yingfang and Zhongcun as the most influential stations and the two most recent input lags as the dominant time steps. A marginal-consistent station-lag diagnostic further localised the strongest first-order contributions to upstream rainfall at t-1 and t-2, while explicitly not being treated as a SHAP interaction estimate. Forecast skill declined from NSE = 0.90 at 1 h to 0.58 at 6 h, indicating that quantitative precipitation forecasts are required for operational 3-6 h prediction. The revised integration framework therefore assigns observation-driven BiLSTM forecasts to the short-lead "1" stage and QPF-informed forecasts to the "3" and "6" stages. The findings support a focused, auditable pathway from data-driven prediction to warning action while defining the limits imposed by event scarcity and missing future rainfall forcing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.