Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42664260›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The impact of maternal incarceration on mothers and children: A scoping review protocol.

Lynn Fenton, Daragh Bradshaw, Rose Galvin, Luke Slattery, Fiona Donson, Aisling Parkes, Leonie Ludwig, Elaine Rogers, Srijani Bose, Anca Minescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lynn FentonDepartment of Psychology, Centre of Social Issues Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8958-2374
Daragh BradshawDepartment of Psychology, Centre of Social Issues Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Rose GalvinSchool of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Luke SlatteryDepartment of Psychology, Centre of Social Issues Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8589-9699
Fiona DonsonDepartment of Law, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Aisling ParkesDepartment of Law, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Leonie LudwigDepartment of Psychology, Centre of Social Issues Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Elaine RogersDepartment of Psychology, Centre of Social Issues Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Srijani BoseDepartment of Psychology, Centre of Social Issues Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Anca MinescuDepartment of Psychology, Centre of Social Issues Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9992-9287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, female incarceration rates have risen in recent decades. Estimates indicate that between 60-80% of incarcerated women are mothers. Maternal incarceration (MI) is associated with negative and often enduring implications for both the mother and child. Recognising the risk of harmful outcomes, evidence-based support for both populations is essential. However, this broad research topic draws interest from academics and practitioners across many distinct but overlapping disciplines, each with different priorities, and methodological and theoretical approaches. Interdisciplinary collaboration remains rare. Consequently, available evidence is spread across different platforms and lacks overview, making it difficult to identify and access key findings, or establish where research gaps exist. Together, these factors hinder researchers and practitioners and constrain efforts to develop evidence‑based support, a task often undertaken by non-governmental organisations already operating with limited resources. Addressing the current lack of overview, this review aims to systematically map the available primary and secondary evidence. Specifically, we seek to explore the overarching research question: 'What empirical evidence is available that documents the impact of MI on (a) mothers and (b) children?' Following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual and Population/Concept/Context framework, a comprehensive search will be conducted across six multidisciplinary databases. Relevant papers will be exported to Covidence and screened by independent reviewers against pre-established inclusion criteria. Included papers will be mapped and relevant information charted using EPPI-Reviewer. Findings will document the scope of the available evidence and identify gaps in our current understanding, creating a helpful resource that can inform future research, advise policy and practice, and guide evidence-based support.

Indexed as

IncarcerationMothersPrisonersChildEvidence GapsFemaleHumansScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42664260
PMCPMC13524290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.