ArticlePloS one2026
Affiliative and agonistic interactions distinguish sex-biased social groups of greater spear-nosed bats, Phyllostomus hastatus.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The social environment, and the interactions that comprise it, can have a profound influence on reproductive success and survival. Yet not all individuals experience the social environment in the same way. In polygynous species wherein males and females experience different competitive environments, sex may be an important factor in shaping the degree to which the social environment serves as a source of support or stress. We investigated patterns of affiliative and agonistic interactions in the highly polygynous greater spear-nosed bat (Phylostomus hastatus), in which sex-biased social niches may be associated with dramatic female-biased survival, to quantify the extent to which these highly sex-biased social environments differed. Agonistic interactions in male-biased bachelor groups were more frequent and longer in duration than those seen in harem groups. Agonistic interactions also differed qualitatively, with bachelor males almost exclusively engaging in dyadic fights in which they deployed highly physical behaviors, such as "wing-locks", rarely observed between females. By contrast, allogrooming was only observed between females in harem groups, particularly before emergence in the evening and upon return to the roost. Taken together, these data suggest that the patterns of social interaction in harem and bachelor groups differ in their valence and intensity, with individuals living in bachelor groups experiencing a social environment characterized by more intense aggression without the positive interactions seen between females in harem groups. We hypothesize that these behavioral differences contribute to the sex-biased differences in allostatic load and survival observed in this species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.