ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Improving mortality rate estimation in 825 European cities: a linear mixed-effects modelling approach using Urban Audit data.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving mortality rate estimation in 825 European cities: a linear mixed-effects modelling approach using Urban Audit data.European journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing the health of urban populations and its determinants is crucial to ensure sustainable urban living. Burden of disease studies and health impact assessments are often used and city-level baseline mortality rates are a key parameter. However, studies tend to use unrepresentative estimates, with regional or national estimates typically applied at city-level, particularly for large-scale studies. We developed a standardized method for age- and sex-specific mortality rate estimation for 825 European cities, using open-source data. To fill for missing data, linear mixed-effects models with natural cubic splines modelled mortality and population data for 2011-19, based on city-specific trends. By generating a publicly available dataset of city-level mortality rates, and a replicable approach for other years, we sought to overcome many of the existing shortcomings in baseline mortality estimates. The highest age-standardized natural-cause mortality rates in 2018 were observed in cities in Hungary, Poland, Croatia, and Czech Republic while the lowest rates were in cities in Spain, France, and Italy. Variation between city-level and national rates was observed, with a median relative deviation of ∼16%. Our method addresses many of the common data quality and harmonization challenges associated with city-level mortality rate estimation. Advancement of effective policies and interventions necessitates robust baseline health data across cities, with good temporal coverage. To achieve this, requires strengthened efforts to improve data accuracy and consistency from regional sources to ensure accurate city-level representation. We fully documented the process and provide the code and data to be used in other studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.