Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663967›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Dissociable effects of schema congruency on item recognition and source memory across levels of expectedness and surprise.

Amnon Yacoby, Andrea Greve, Erin Schaverien, Limor Shtoots, Richard N Henson, Daniel A Levy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amnon YacobySchool of Psychology, Reichman University, 8 HaUniversita St., 4610101, Herzliya, Israel. amnon.yacoby@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0084-5583
Andrea GreveMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, UK.
Erin SchaverienSchool of Psychology, Reichman University, 8 HaUniversita St., 4610101, Herzliya, Israel.
Limor ShtootsSchool of Medicine, Reichman University, 8 HaUniversita St., 4610101, Herzliya, Israel.
Richard N HensonMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, UK.
Daniel A LevySchool of Psychology, Reichman University, 8 HaUniversita St., 4610101, Herzliya, Israel.

Funding

UK Medical Research Council (MRC) grant number SUAG/086/G116768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior knowledge can enhance memory for both schema-congruent and schema-incongruent events. According to the SLIMM framework, memory performance generally follows a U-shaped pattern, with both highly expected and highly surprising events being better remembered than neutral ones. We tested this prediction across four experiments in which participants viewed scenes containing congruent or incongruent objects, rating each as expected or surprising on a four-level scale. Memory was assessed using: (1) old/new item recognition categorized by recollection and familiarity, and (2) source memory, in which participants reported whether objects had been rated as expected or surprising at study. Schema effects on memory varied by test type. Item recognition consistently showed an advantage for expected trials only, primarily via recollection, while familiarity (if assumed independent of recollection) increased with surprise level-contrary to SLIMM's predictions. We hypothesize that schema-related retrieval strategies enhance recollection of expected objects. Source memory did produce a reliable U-shaped pattern, even though this particular task should only produce an advantage for surprising trials according to SLIMM. We suggest participants tagged events as "surprising" or "expected" during study and could later recall the tag. When the tag was 'weak' or unavailable-more likely for moderately categorized events-participants fell back on schema-related retrieval strategy, which benefits retrieval of expected events. Together, these mechanisms produce the observed U-shaped pattern for source memory. Our findings reveal the complex retrieval test dependent manner in which prior knowledge shapes episodic memory.

Indexed as

CongruencyMemoryRetrievalSchemaSurprise

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.