SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Biomechanics of Rugby Tackle Techniques in Youth and Adult Players: A Systematic Review of Age-Specific Injury Risk and Performance Implications.
Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTackling is a vital skill in rugby that greatly influences both performance outcomes, such as carry distance and possession gain, and injury risk, such as the frequency of concussions and cervical injuries. Approximately 72% of head impacts in rugby occur during tackles, leading to concussions and cervical trauma. Technical skill in tackle mechanics is therefore central to player safety.
objectivesThis systematic review evaluates tackle biomechanics across age groups to identify differences in technique and injury patterns and to inform age-specific coaching strategies.
methodsThis systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD420251103973) and adhered to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar were searched without date restrictions. Studies analysing tackle biomechanics, injury mechanisms or performance outcomes in youth or adult rugby players were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria.
resultsAcross the 32 included studies, three patterns emerged. First, tackler head-in-front positioning was associated with a five- to eight-fold increase in per-tackle concussion risk and was more common in youth players than adults. Second, dominant-shoulder tackles consistently produced lower head accelerations than non-dominant tackles, with this safety advantage eroding under match-induced fatigue. Third, youth players showed lower tackle proficiency scores than adults, characterised by reduced hip and knee flexion, less leg drive and more frequent arm-only contact. Across studies, evidence quality was moderate; few studies used non-injury controls to support causal claims.
conclusionsAge-specific coaching strategies are warranted to optimise tackle safety and performance. Emphasising correct head positioning, dominant-shoulder engagement and lower-limb mechanics may mitigate injury risk in youth rugby. The current evidence base supports associations rather than firm causal claims; future case-control studies that compare injury and non-injury tackles within the same match environment would strengthen this evidence.
Identifiers
42663931What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.