ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
A low-cost imaging platform for quantitative characterisation of scaffold surface macrotopography with potential application in craniofacial tissue engineering.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Craniofacial bone regeneration is a demanding application of tissue engineering (TE) in which scaffold architecture-pore size, shape and spatial distribution-is a determinant of regenerative success, so that reliable geometric quality control is a prerequisite for translation. Conventional assessment of printed scaffold geometry is largely manual, time-consuming and subject to operator variability. Here we present a low-cost, semi-automated imaging platform that combines custom 3D-printed hardware-a 12.3 MP Raspberry Pi High Quality Camera with a 6 mm CS-mount lens, an adjustable monopod and a ring illuminator-with a dedicated image-processing pipeline. The system acquires a single zenithal image of a scaffold and segments it to quantify the number, area, perimeter and compactness of the pores of the uppermost printed layer; it therefore characterises two-dimensional surface macrotopography and does not resolve internal three-dimensional architecture or pore interconnectivity. On a printed reference grid the platform was highly repeatable (coefficient of variation, CV = 1.33%) but systematically underestimated pore area by 11.6%, a reproducible bias that can be removed by calibration. On a 3D-printed PLA scaffold, repeated acquisitions agreed to within CV = 0.01-2.48% (N = 5), whereas manual measurement of the same specimen by three experienced operators gave an inter-user CV of 11.5-22.8% and an intra-user CV of 0-12.7%. Feasibility was further demonstrated on two silica-gelatin hybrid bioink scaffolds and on a silica-based scaffold with non-linear pore boundaries. The total hardware cost is approximately €170. By reducing user-dependent variability under the conditions tested, and at a cost accessible to standard laboratories, the platform provides a practical quality-control tool for scaffold fabrication, with potential application to craniofacial tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.