ArticleSports medicine - open2026
Orthometria: Metric Fixation in Digital Health and a Framework for Responsible Use in High-Performance Sport.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of consumer-grade digital health technologies has expanded physiological data collection beyond clinical and laboratory settings. In high-performance sport, these devices offer genuine utility for monitoring sleep, cardiac activity, and recovery. However, their widespread adoption has outpaced frameworks for responsible implementation. This perspective introduces orthometria, derived from ortho- (correct) and -metria (to measure), to describe the counterproductive fixation on digital health metrics collected via commercially available health technology. Orthometria is not proposed as a clinical phenomenon but as a behavioural descriptor for when the collection and review of any physiological metric obtained using a digital health device creates anxiety or has a negative effect on well-being or performance. The construct is introduced not to sensationalise potential risks or deter technology use, but to facilitate clearer discussion, monitoring, and responsible, effective implementation. Drawing on Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, a five-stage framework is proposed for the responsible implementation of digital health technology in high-performance sport. Future research should explore framework efficacy, validate an orthometria-specific psychometric scale, and examine which metric types most influence athlete behaviour.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.