ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Enhancing Current-Source Imaging in Magnetocardiography: The Impact of Sensor Array Configuration.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While magnetocardiography (MCG) is a non-invasive tool for assessing cardiac electrophysiology, its conventional planar sensor array often struggles to accurately estimate sources distant from the sensor. This limitation hinders the precise localization of deep cardiac activity. This study aims to overcome this challenge by investigating a novel cylindrical sensor array designed to improve source current estimation accuracy. We combined numerical simulations, phantom measurements, and in vivo rat experiments to compare a cylindrical sensor array with a conventional planar array. Single dipole localization was used in the simulation and phantom experiments under controlled focal source conditions, whereas both single-dipole fitting and minimum norm estimation (MNE)-based distributed source analyses were applied to the animal MCG data. The simulations and phantom measurements showed that the cylindrical array achieved more accurate single-dipole localization than the planar array under comparable sensor-source distance conditions. In the animal experiments, this advantage was not clearly observed using single-dipole fitting. The MNE-based distributed source analysis showed geometry-dependent reconstruction patterns, with the cylindrical array producing more posteriorly distributed activity and higher source map repeatability. The cylindrical sensor array provided complementary spatial information to anterior planar sampling, particularly for deeper or posterior cardiac activity. These findings suggest that surrounding sensor coverage may provide complementary information for MCG-based reconstruction, although further validation with realistic activation models remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.