ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
A Generalization of the Ternary Binding Model to Membrane-Confined Systems With Finite Copy Number.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard Douglass ternary binding model (TBM) for three-body equilibria assumes a well-mixed, three-dimensional solution. When applied to bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), however, the productive trimeric complex forms not in bulk solution but within a nanoscale membrane synapse with finite receptor copy numbers. We present a generalization of the TBM to membrane-confined systems that replaces the macroscopic bulk volume with a coarse-grained reactive contact volume defined by synapse geometry and microvillus topology, and extends the deterministic equilibrium to a stochastic description via the chemical master equation. The framework preserves the original algebra while restoring its representational capacity for the regime in which therapeutic activity occurs. A key finding is that conventional bulk mapping places the system in the affinity-limited regime, where antigen density is mathematically inert and the TBM predicts identical dose-response regardless of target expression. Membrane confinement shifts effective antigen concentration by six orders of magnitude-from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.