ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026
Structural Heart Interventions in Women with Congenital Heart Disease.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo provide a review of current transcatheter interventions in women with congenital heart disease, with a focus on sex-specific considerations in diagnosis, management, and follow-up. RECENT
findingsAs the field of pediatric cardiology advances and patients with previously life-limiting diagnoses now survive well into adulthood, there is a growing need to pursue management strategies that improve quality of life. Unfortunately, in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, women have historically been underrepresented in research studies and clinical trials, which may limit the generalizability of available evidence and contribute to disparities in outcomes. Women with congenital heart disease (CHD) are an even more vulnerable population given the relatively low prevalence of CHD. This review discusses several CHD lesions and current trends in diagnosis, management, and follow-up in women. Additionally, it highlights sex-specific considerations in this unique patient population. Future initiatives and applications that may help improve the lifetime care of women with CHD are also reviewed. Although there have been increasing efforts to improve the inclusion of women in medical research in recent years, substantial gaps in representation remain. As emerging technologies are increasingly introduced in the CHD field, there is an important opportunity to improve the representation of women in studies evaluating procedural outcomes. Tools such as artificial intelligence and machine learning may help facilitate scalable screening and risk-stratification strategies for women with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.