ArticleOecologia2026
Plants adjust leaf senescence in response to light heterogeneity across branches.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The senescence of productive leaves is expected to decrease canopy photosynthesis, but it may allow plants to use resorbed nitrogen for new growth. If plants use leaf senescence as part of a competitive strategy, we expect that leaves with low competitive value would be sacrificed to supply nitrogen to leaves with high competitive value. However, when plants have multiple branches, it is unclear if plants can target leaves in shaded conditions for senescence and whether they prioritize the growth of their shaded or unshaded branches. We measured changes in leaf nitrogen in sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) grown with two symmetrical branches that were then subjected to either shaded or unshaded light conditions. We complemented the experiment with a mathematical model of leaf senescence to test whether our proposed physiological mechanisms could explain the results. When both branches were grown in low light, leaf senescence was inhibited relative to plants with both branches grown in high light. For plants with one branch in high light and one branch in low light, the senescence of older leaves was inhibited in the high-light branch, but accelerated in the low-light branch. This was associated with an increase in the growth rate of the youngest leaves in the low-light branch. Our mathematical model reproduced these results, suggesting that leaf senescence may be mediated by the carbon status of the plant. The pattern of leaf senescence and growth in this experiment was consistent with a strategy that prioritizes competing with neighbors for light rather than avoiding competition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.