Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663736›Full record

ArticleOecologia2026

Plants adjust leaf senescence in response to light heterogeneity across branches.

Isaac Kazuo Uyehara, Luisa Wienges, Mark van Kleunen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isaac Kazuo UyeharaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, California, USA. ikuyehara@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-8498
Luisa WiengesDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Mark van KleunenCentre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2117-422037984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The senescence of productive leaves is expected to decrease canopy photosynthesis, but it may allow plants to use resorbed nitrogen for new growth. If plants use leaf senescence as part of a competitive strategy, we expect that leaves with low competitive value would be sacrificed to supply nitrogen to leaves with high competitive value. However, when plants have multiple branches, it is unclear if plants can target leaves in shaded conditions for senescence and whether they prioritize the growth of their shaded or unshaded branches. We measured changes in leaf nitrogen in sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) grown with two symmetrical branches that were then subjected to either shaded or unshaded light conditions. We complemented the experiment with a mathematical model of leaf senescence to test whether our proposed physiological mechanisms could explain the results. When both branches were grown in low light, leaf senescence was inhibited relative to plants with both branches grown in high light. For plants with one branch in high light and one branch in low light, the senescence of older leaves was inhibited in the high-light branch, but accelerated in the low-light branch. This was associated with an increase in the growth rate of the youngest leaves in the low-light branch. Our mathematical model reproduced these results, suggesting that leaf senescence may be mediated by the carbon status of the plant. The pattern of leaf senescence and growth in this experiment was consistent with a strategy that prioritizes competing with neighbors for light rather than avoiding competition.

Indexed as

HelianthusLightPlant LeavesPlant SenescenceModels, BiologicalNitrogenPhotosynthesisNitrogenBranch autonomyCorrelative inhibitionHelianthus annuusLeaf nitrogenModularityPartial shadePhenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.