ArticleOecologia2026
Delayed hatching as a life-history response to intraguild predation: interspecific variation in predatory mites.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When and why embryos delay hatching in response to predation risk remains poorly understood, particularly across species experiencing different ecological contexts. Predator-induced hatching plasticity allows embryos to adjust hatching timing in response to predator cues, yet interspecific variation in delayed hatching has rarely been examined. Phytoseiid mites provide a useful system because delayed hatching can be induced by mechanical stimuli mimicking predator attacks, and predation risk from cannibalism and intraguild predation (IGP) in the vulnerable larval stage varies among species according to diet specialisation. We compared delayed hatching responses among four phytoseiid mite species differing in cannibalism and diet specialisation by exposing eggs to mechanical stimulation and recording hatching timing with unstimulated controls. Mechanical stimulation induced stronger delayed hatching responses in Neoseiulus californicus (odds ratio = 5.73) and Neoseiulus cucumeris (odds ratio = 7.83), a weaker response in Phytoseiulus persimilis (odds ratio = 3.11), and no detectable response in Typhlodromus bambusae (odds ratio = 0.99). The magnitude of delayed hatching corresponded to interspecific differences in cannibalism and diet specialisation, suggesting that variation in predation risk associated with intraguild interactions shapes hatching timing strategies. These findings support the hypothesis that delayed hatching is an adaptive life-history response to intraguild predation risk and suggest that interspecific variation in hatching plasticity may have important consequences for predator community dynamics and the establishment success of biological control agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.