ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Immersive head-mounted control of a robotic laparoscopic camera: a usability and accuracy evaluation.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery has addressed limitations of minimally invasive surgery, namely: assistant hand tremors during camera holding and communication errors among team members. However, advanced systems require substantial investment and operating-room space. As a result, recent studies have explored laparoscopic camera control through virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) devices, though their usability and accuracy relative to existing solutions remain unclear. This study presents a novel immersive framework using an Oculus Quest 3 headset to control a KUKA LBR iiwa robot, comparing its accuracy and time-response (TR). Moreover, its usability was compared against two state-of-art controllers: Image1Pilot and SoloAssist Joystick. TR was measured by moving the VR headset with one robot while a second robot reproduced the transmitted motion. Tracking accuracy was assessed via a four-point trajectory, using simultaneously measurements from the VR, robot flange, and an optical tracking system. Usability and task performance were assessed in 35 participants using a camera-control task and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results showed an average TR of 143.10 ± 28.50ms, and a maximum positional error of 12.60 mm over a 150 mm displacement. SUS scores revealed no statistically significant differences in usability across interfaces (H = 0.174, p = 0.917). All achieved an "Acceptable" rating (SUS ≈ 70). In the 3rd trial, The Image1Pilot enabled significantly faster task completion than the VR interface ([Formula: see text]), though no significant difference versus the SoloAssist Joystick. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that VR control for laparoscopic cameras can be compared to existing joysticks in terms of usability, but its control method requires further refinement to reduce task completion time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.