Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663719›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Immersive head-mounted control of a robotic laparoscopic camera: a usability and accuracy evaluation.

Sérgio G Pereira, Pedro Morais, Fernando Rocha, Nuno S Osório, Estela Vilhena, Estevão Lima, João L Vilaça

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sérgio G Pereira2Ai - Applied Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Technology, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave, Barcelos, Portugal. sfpereira@ipca.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2704-3831
Pedro Morais2Ai - Applied Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Technology, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave, Barcelos, Portugal.
Fernando Rocha2Ai - Applied Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Technology, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave, Barcelos, Portugal.
Nuno S OsórioLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Guimarães, Portugal.
Estela Vilhena2Ai - Applied Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Technology, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave, Barcelos, Portugal.
Estevão LimaFaculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
João L Vilaça2Ai - Applied Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Technology, Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave, Barcelos, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic surgery has addressed limitations of minimally invasive surgery, namely: assistant hand tremors during camera holding and communication errors among team members. However, advanced systems require substantial investment and operating-room space. As a result, recent studies have explored laparoscopic camera control through virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) devices, though their usability and accuracy relative to existing solutions remain unclear. This study presents a novel immersive framework using an Oculus Quest 3 headset to control a KUKA LBR iiwa robot, comparing its accuracy and time-response (TR). Moreover, its usability was compared against two state-of-art controllers: Image1Pilot and SoloAssist Joystick. TR was measured by moving the VR headset with one robot while a second robot reproduced the transmitted motion. Tracking accuracy was assessed via a four-point trajectory, using simultaneously measurements from the VR, robot flange, and an optical tracking system. Usability and task performance were assessed in 35 participants using a camera-control task and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results showed an average TR of 143.10 ± 28.50ms, and a maximum positional error of 12.60 mm over a 150 mm displacement. SUS scores revealed no statistically significant differences in usability across interfaces (H = 0.174, p = 0.917). All achieved an "Acceptable" rating (SUS ≈ 70). In the 3rd trial, The Image1Pilot enabled significantly faster task completion than the VR interface ([Formula: see text]), though no significant difference versus the SoloAssist Joystick. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that VR control for laparoscopic cameras can be compared to existing joysticks in terms of usability, but its control method requires further refinement to reduce task completion time.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAugmented RealityEquipment DesignHumansUser-Computer InterfaceVirtual RealityLaparoscopic camera controlRobotic camera holderRobotic surgeryVirtual reality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.