ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Treating through in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mild cutaneous eruptions during drug therapy in hospitalized children often lead to treatment discontinuation. Data on continuation strategies such as treating through (TT) in pediatric patients are limited. To evaluate the safety and outcomes of the TT approach in hospitalized children with mild cutaneous drug eruptions. Patients aged 0-18 years hospitalized between September 2019 and June 2025 and evaluated for suspected drug allergy were included if they had mild cutaneous eruptions without systemic involvement and continued the suspected drug. Demographic, clinical, and treatment outcome data were analyzed. Ninety patients were included (median age 96 months; 60% male). Antibiotics were the most common suspected drugs (73.3%), with beta-lactams predominating (37.8%). Maculopapular rash occurred in 78.9% and urticaria in 21.1%. Reactions developed on the first day in 33.3% and within 6 h after the last dose in 74.4%. Treatment was successfully completed in 98.9% of patients; only one patient required discontinuation due to rash progression during fluconazole therapy.
conclusionIn carefully selected hospitalized children with non-severe cutaneous drug eruptions, the TT approach appears to be a safe and effective strategy when continuation of therapy is clinically necessary.
trial registrationNot applicable. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Mild cutaneous drug eruptions, particularly maculopapular exanthems and delayed urticaria without systemic involvement, are generally considered low-risk phenotypes in children; however, they are frequently interpreted as drug allergy and may lead to unnecessary discontinuation of essential therapies. • "Treating through" (TT), defined as continuing the suspected drug despite a mild, non-severe cutaneous eruption when treatment is clinically necessary, has been described mainly in adults, while pediatric evidence remains limited. WHAT IS NEW: • In this single-center cohort of 90 hospitalized children with mild cutaneous eruptions and no systemic involvement, treatment was successfully completed in 89 patients (98.9%) when the suspected drug was continued using a TT approach. • These findings suggest that, in carefully selected children requiring essential therapy, TT may be a feasible strategy to avoid unnecessary treatment discontinuation when implemented with individualized risk-benefi t assessment and close clinical monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663704What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.