ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Age-related differences in embodying a tool under visual deprivation.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The active self in autism: multisensory and sensorimotor foundations of bodily self-representation.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tool embodiment refers to the integration of external objects into action-related body representations. Although vision is often assumed to support this process, it remains unclear how tool use under short-term visual deprivation affects explicit ownership and agency across the adult lifespan. This study examined whether blindfolded cane use elicits subjective ownership and agency in younger and older adults, and whether these experiences are associated with forearm tactile distance perception and perceived reaching distance. Forty-three healthy right-handed adults completed two blindfolded cane-use conditions: object search training and navigation training. Tactile Distance Judgment and Reaching Distance Estimation tasks were administered before and after cane use, and participants rated ownership and agency after each condition. Across age groups and conditions, agency ratings were consistently stronger than ownership ratings. Regression analyses indicated that behavioral recalibration measures, especially Reaching Distance Estimation Error, were more consistently associated with agency than ownership, with the clearest joint-model effect observed for agency during navigation. Age Group also contributed to agency during navigation, although age-dependent interaction effects did not reach statistical significance. These findings suggest that short-term blindfolded cane use can support explicit action-based control over a tool without necessarily producing a strong conscious feeling that the tool belongs to the body. The results highlight a dissociation between explicit ownership, agency, and behavioral indices of tool-related sensorimotor updating under blindfolded tool use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.