Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663683›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Age-related differences in embodying a tool under visual deprivation.

Amir Jahanian Najafabadi, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amir Jahanian NajafabadiDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Bielefeld University, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany. amir.jahanian@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-5141
Bernhard HommelSchool of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250061, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tool embodiment refers to the integration of external objects into action-related body representations. Although vision is often assumed to support this process, it remains unclear how tool use under short-term visual deprivation affects explicit ownership and agency across the adult lifespan. This study examined whether blindfolded cane use elicits subjective ownership and agency in younger and older adults, and whether these experiences are associated with forearm tactile distance perception and perceived reaching distance. Forty-three healthy right-handed adults completed two blindfolded cane-use conditions: object search training and navigation training. Tactile Distance Judgment and Reaching Distance Estimation tasks were administered before and after cane use, and participants rated ownership and agency after each condition. Across age groups and conditions, agency ratings were consistently stronger than ownership ratings. Regression analyses indicated that behavioral recalibration measures, especially Reaching Distance Estimation Error, were more consistently associated with agency than ownership, with the clearest joint-model effect observed for agency during navigation. Age Group also contributed to agency during navigation, although age-dependent interaction effects did not reach statistical significance. These findings suggest that short-term blindfolded cane use can support explicit action-based control over a tool without necessarily producing a strong conscious feeling that the tool belongs to the body. The results highlight a dissociation between explicit ownership, agency, and behavioral indices of tool-related sensorimotor updating under blindfolded tool use.

Indexed as

AgingDistance PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceSensory DeprivationTouch PerceptionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSense of AgencyYoung AdultAgencyAgingBody schemaCane useOwnershipReaching distance estimationTool useVisual deprivation

Identifiers

PMID42663683
PMCPMC13525023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.