Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663644›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Sound localization acuity, use of cues, and vision in rabbits and five rodents: implications for evolution.

R S Heffner, H E Heffner, G Koay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R S HeffnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA. RHeffner5@mac.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-0500
H E HeffnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
G KoayDepartment of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.

Funding

NIH HHS R01 DC02960, R21 DC03258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left/right and front/back sound-localization thresholds, as well as the ability to use binaural time and intensity cues, are presented for one lagomorph (domestic rabbits) and five species of rodents (fox squirrel, black-tailed prairie dog, groundhog, eastern chipmunk, and spiny mouse). These localization abilities are compared to those of other mammals and all three are shown to vary widely. Many species do not localize as accurately as the available physical locus cues would seem to permit. Instead, localization acuity is negatively correlated with the width of the field of best vision. This coordination of hearing and vision allows auditory information on the location of sound sources to direct the reflexive orientation of vision and attention for further evaluation. It is possible that the coordination of hearing with vision drives the evolution of sound localization among mammals. Species differences in front/back discrimination are less well studied but also vary widely, and may be influenced by complex interactions between pinna size and complexity. Finally the use of interaural phase differences varies in unexpected ways raising questions about the anatomical and neural mechanisms that underlie binaural analysis in the nervous system.

Indexed as

Binaural cuesEvolutionNoise localizationPinnaeVision

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.