Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663639›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026

Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling.

Antero Heikkilä, Ismo Strandén, Martin H Lidauer, Klaus Nordhausen, Sara Taskinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antero HeikkiläDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland. antero.j.heikkila@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3088-3430
Ismo StrandénNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Martin H LidauerNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Klaus NordhausenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Sara TaskinenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Jyväskylä, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Funding

HiTEc COST Action CA21163Research Council of Finland 356484Research Council of Finland 363261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe evaluated four existing Monte Carlo-based methods for approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model. All four methods yielded consistent approximations of the exact values. Genomic prediction models, such as genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), use genomic data to improve the accuracy of estimated genetic values. As the number of genotypes and traits increases, the exact calculation of prediction error variances (PEVs) and reliabilities becomes computationally infeasible due to the need to invert the coefficient matrix of the mixed model equations, whose dimension increases directly with the number of individuals and traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the Monte Carlo (MC) sampling method to approximate PEVs and reliabilities in a multiple-trait GBLUP framework relevant to hybrid breeding. The MC method avoids direct matrix inversion by repeatedly sampling genetic values from their assumed distributions to approximate PEVs. We applied the MC method using four previously published formulas to approximate PEVs and reliabilities. All formulas produced consistent estimates of PEVs and reliabilities, with convergence rates depending on the formula, the level of reliability, and the MC sample size.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticPlant BreedingGenotypeMonte Carlo MethodPhenotypePrediction AlgorithmsReproducibility of Results35A0165L1065L1265L2065L70

Identifiers

PMID42663639
PMCPMC13525033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.