ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model using Monte Carlo sampling.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageWe evaluated four existing Monte Carlo-based methods for approximating prediction error variances and reliabilities in a multiple-trait genomic prediction model. All four methods yielded consistent approximations of the exact values. Genomic prediction models, such as genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), use genomic data to improve the accuracy of estimated genetic values. As the number of genotypes and traits increases, the exact calculation of prediction error variances (PEVs) and reliabilities becomes computationally infeasible due to the need to invert the coefficient matrix of the mixed model equations, whose dimension increases directly with the number of individuals and traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the Monte Carlo (MC) sampling method to approximate PEVs and reliabilities in a multiple-trait GBLUP framework relevant to hybrid breeding. The MC method avoids direct matrix inversion by repeatedly sampling genetic values from their assumed distributions to approximate PEVs. We applied the MC method using four previously published formulas to approximate PEVs and reliabilities. All formulas produced consistent estimates of PEVs and reliabilities, with convergence rates depending on the formula, the level of reliability, and the MC sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.