Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663630›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

The challenge of OF5 vertebral fractures treatment: a modified muscle-preserving surgical technique and case-series presentation with a minimum 2-Year follow-up.

Pietro Feltri, Anne Tabard-Fougère, Khalid Al Taha, Andreas Tsoupras, Nicolas Lauper, Dennis E Dominguez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pietro FeltriGeneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva's Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne Tabard-FougèreGeneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva's Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-1048
Khalid Al TahaGeneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva's Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andreas TsouprasGeneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva's Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. andreas.tsoupras@gmail.com.
Nicolas LauperGeneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva's Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dennis E DominguezGeneva University Hospitals and the University of Geneva's Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe surgical management of severe osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OF5 type) is complex and lacks a standardized approach. This study aimed: (1) to describe a modified surgical technique designed to offer broad exposure of the spine while preserving the paraspinal musculature; and (2) to present a case series of 15 OF5 patients with a 2-year follow-up.

methodsPatients with OF5 were consecutively treated with SpineJack

resultsIn the 15 patients, a mean of 4.1 vertebrae (min. 2 - max. 6) were instrumented, with a mean operative time of 200.7 ± 80.4 min (min. 101 - max. 373 min). Mean blood loss was 246.9 ± 234.1 mL (min. 0 - max. 700 mL). Two postoperative complications occurred. All the radiographic parameters (VKA and VH) improved postoperatively: mean VKA improved from 17.8 ± 6.4° preoperatively to 6.0 ± 4.7° at 12 months and 6.9 ± 4.9° at final follow-up (p < 0.001); mean medial/posterior vertebral height ratio improved from 55.2 ± 16.9% to 87.1 ± 11.9% at 12 months and 74.6 ± 11.8% at final follow-up (p < 0.001). The improvement was stable at the latest long-term follow-up.

conclusionsIn this technical note and consecutive case series, the described technique was associated with favorable radiographic outcomes, low complication rates and acceptable blood loss. These preliminary findings suggest potential benefit, but prospective comparative studies are needed to confirm efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

Minimally invasive spine surgeryNavigated spinal surgeryOF5 classificationOsteoporotic vertebral fracturePerfascial approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.