Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663627›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage.

Anna Spicher, Richard A Lindtner, Tim Egelseer, Rene Schmid, Peter W Ferlic, Romed Hörmann, Werner Schmoelz, Richard Bostelmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna SpicherDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Richard A LindtnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4793-4260
Tim EgelseerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Rene SchmidDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter W FerlicDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Romed HörmannDivision Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Werner SchmoelzDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. werner.schmoelz@i-med.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-2594
Richard BostelmannDepartment of Orthopaedics, Spine Surgery and Traumatology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Wesel, Wesel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation (LPWV) and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading.

methodsTwenty fresh-frozen human thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10-L1) were randomly allocated to two experimental groups (n = 10 each). In Group 1, each vertebra received one standard intrapedicular screw and one LPWV screw, with screw trajectories randomly assigned to the left or right pedicle. In Group 2, both pedicles were initially instrumented with LPWV screws; one screw per vertebra was randomly selected for redirection into a standard intrapedicular trajectory, while the contralateral LPWV screw was left in place. All screws were subjected to cyclic cranio-caudal loading with stepwise increasing compressive load until loosening.

resultsLPWV screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than standard intrapedicular screws (5230 ± 2481 vs. 8205 ± 3027 cycles; p = 0.003), corresponding to a 36% reduction in anchorage. Redirected screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than LPWV screws left in place (3686 ± 2105 vs. 5489 ± 2731 cycles; p = 0.018), representing an additional 33% reduction.

conclusionLPWV substantially compromises pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading, even when the screw remains at least half contained within the pedicle and fully contained within the vertebral body. Redirection of LPWV screws using the same diameter does not restore fixation strength but is associated with a further reduction in anchorage, challenging the assumption that redirection inherently improves screw stability. Redirection of LPWV screws using screws of the same dimensions and design may therefore be considered with caution, particularly in the absence of neural or vascular compromise.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsCyclic loadingPedicle screwsScrew malpositionScrew redirectionSpinal fixation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.