ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation (LPWV) and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading.
methodsTwenty fresh-frozen human thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10-L1) were randomly allocated to two experimental groups (n = 10 each). In Group 1, each vertebra received one standard intrapedicular screw and one LPWV screw, with screw trajectories randomly assigned to the left or right pedicle. In Group 2, both pedicles were initially instrumented with LPWV screws; one screw per vertebra was randomly selected for redirection into a standard intrapedicular trajectory, while the contralateral LPWV screw was left in place. All screws were subjected to cyclic cranio-caudal loading with stepwise increasing compressive load until loosening.
resultsLPWV screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than standard intrapedicular screws (5230 ± 2481 vs. 8205 ± 3027 cycles; p = 0.003), corresponding to a 36% reduction in anchorage. Redirected screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than LPWV screws left in place (3686 ± 2105 vs. 5489 ± 2731 cycles; p = 0.018), representing an additional 33% reduction.
conclusionLPWV substantially compromises pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading, even when the screw remains at least half contained within the pedicle and fully contained within the vertebral body. Redirection of LPWV screws using the same diameter does not restore fixation strength but is associated with a further reduction in anchorage, challenging the assumption that redirection inherently improves screw stability. Redirection of LPWV screws using screws of the same dimensions and design may therefore be considered with caution, particularly in the absence of neural or vascular compromise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.