ArticleDiabetologia2026
Rotavirus vaccination and incidence of type 1 diabetes: a population-based natural experiment.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisEnvironmental factors, including infections, have been suspected to influence the risk of type 1 diabetes. Studies of rotavirus vaccine and risk of type 1 diabetes have shown conflicting results. We took advantage of the rapid and high uptake of the rotavirus vaccine among infants in Norway as a natural experiment to study the potential association between rotavirus vaccination and type 1 diabetes incidence in Norway.
methodsIn this cohort study, we followed all children born in Norway during 2007-2019 from 6 months to 5 years of age for type 1 diabetes. In an interrupted time series analysis, we compared type 1 diabetes incidence in children born before compared with after introduction of the rotavirus vaccination programme in September 2014.
resultsOf 740,744 included children, 846 were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes between 6 months and 5 years of age. Our primary interrupted time series analysis showed an increasing trend after implementation of the rotavirus vaccination programme (relative HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.03, 1.20]), which was not significant after excluding birth cohorts from 2013-2015 to avoid potential herd immunity effects (relative HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.93, 1.18]). In a secondary analysis comparing fully vaccinated with non-vaccinated children, the adjusted HR was 1.17 (95% CI 0.78, 1.77). CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThis study found no evidence for a reduced risk of type 1 diabetes after introduction of rotavirus vaccination in infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.