ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Imaging manifestations of malignancy in inflammatory bowel disease: patterns, pitfalls and pearls.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary malignancies arising in the setting of chronic inflammation, dysplasia, stricturing disease, and fistulizing complications. Although endoscopic surveillance remains the cornerstone for dysplasia detection, imaging plays an increasingly important complementary role in identifying invasive malignancy, evaluating transmural and extra-intestinal disease, and detecting lesions in segments inaccessible or poorly amenable to endoscopic assessment. Distinguishing malignant transformation from chronic inflammatory change remains challenging because imaging findings frequently overlap. In practice, malignancy is often suggested less by a single defining feature than by deviation from the expected imaging behaviour of inflammatory disease over time. This review summarizes the imaging manifestations of malignancy in IBD across the small bowel, colon, rectum, perianal region, and hepatobiliary system, with emphasis on Crohn's disease-associated small bowel adenocarcinoma, colitis-associated colorectal carcinoma, fistula-associated anorectal malignancy, and cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Key diagnostic pitfalls, mimics, and structured reporting considerations are discussed, together with emerging quantitative and molecular imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI, dual-energy CT, radiomics, elastography, and fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-based imaging. Recognition of subtle interval morphologic change and discordance from expected inflammatory behaviour is central to earlier detection of IBD-associated malignancy. Careful longitudinal comparison and multidisciplinary correlation remain essential, with radiologists playing a critical role in identifying imaging features that warrant intensified surveillance, tissue sampling, or further intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42663624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.