Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663623›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Selected gynecologic MRI mimics and pitfalls: practical problem-solving pearls.

Murilo Peixoto, Iva Petkovska, Melissa McGettigan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Murilo PeixotoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4361-323X
Iva PetkovskaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. petkovsi@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-6494
Melissa McGettiganDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-8224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the evaluation of suspected gynecologic malignancies, providing high soft tissue contrast and multiparametric capabilities, including diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement, aiding in diagnosis and management strategies. However, a variety of benign entities and non-neoplastic conditions may demonstrate overlapping imaging features with malignant tumors on MRI, creating potential diagnostic pitfalls and delaying treatment or prompting unnecessary interventions. These include endometriosis, atypical leiomyoma variants, ovarian fibromatosis, and treatment- or procedure-related changes, among others. Furthermore, rare malignant entities may mimic more common malignant entities or occasionally have features that overlap with benign entities, both of which can have important implications in determining the appropriate management plan. This pictorial essay highlights key MRI findings of selected gynecologic conditions that represent common and uncommon diagnostic pitfalls. Emphasis is placed on imaging patterns, multiparametric MRI features, and correlation with clinical presentation. By illustrating characteristic findings and highlighting distinguishing features, this review aims to enhance radiologists' confidence in differentiating benign mimics from true malignancy.

Indexed as

Diagnostic pitfallsEndometriosisGynecologic oncology imagingImaging mimicsPelvic MRIUterine and adnexal masses

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.