ReviewCardiology journal2026
Aortic valve repair in 2026 - state of the art: what every cardiologist should know.
Review in Cardiology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic valve repair (AVr) has evolved into a reproducible surgical strategy for selected patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), offering preservation of native tissue, avoidance of prosthesis-related complications, and favorable long-term outcomes when performed at expert centers. This narrative review summarizes contemporary concepts, indications, preoperative imaging work-up, and procedure selection for AVr in tricuspid (TAV) and bicuspid (BAV) aortic valves, with an emphasis on functional mechanisms and standardized annular and root stabilization. Recent international guidelines and key surgical series and registries addressing aortic valve repair, valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR), annuloplasty strategies, and bicuspid repair techniques were reviewed. Modern AVr is anchored in mechanism-based diagnosis of AR, systematic correction of cusp pathology, and stabilization of the functional aortic annulus (FAA), including the virtual basal ring, sinotubular junction, and aortic root. Current guideline recommendations support aortic valve repair in selected patients with severe AR at experienced centers when durable results are expected and recommend valve-sparing root replacement in young patients with aortic root dilation. Quantitative intraoperative quality control, including effective height targets, and durable annular stabilization are key determinants of repair longevity. AVr and VSRR represent mature surgical options for carefully selected patients with AR, particularly younger individuals with good cusp tissue and access to high-volume repair expertise. A mechanism-driven algorithm, including BAV-specific geometry restoration approaches such as the 180-degree reimplantation technique, may clarify the optimal procedure for each clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.