ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Mixed Evidence that Dosage Sensitive Genes Drive Global Dosage Compensation in Flour Beetles.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heteromorphic sex chromosomes create inherent gene dosage differences between males and females because one sex carries a single copy of the X chromosome while the other carries two. Many species have evolved mechanisms that equalize X-linked gene expression between the sexes and, in some cases, restore ancestral autosomal levels, a process known as dosage compensation. Although chromosome-wide compensation is common in male heterogametic (XY) insects, regulatory outcomes vary across taxa and sex chromosome systems, leaving the evolutionary forces shaping sex chromosome regulation unresolved. One hypothesis proposes that the extent to which genes are sensitive to changes in gene dose determines whether complete compensation evolves. We tested predictions of this insensitive sex chromosome hypothesis (ISCH) across five flour beetle species using comparative transcriptomics and genome-wide RNAi-derived measures of gene-by-gene sensitivity. Including an X-autosome fusion in Tribolium confusum allowed direct assessment of expression evolution following a transition from a diploid autosome to a hemizygous Neo-X. Across all five species, we detect complete chromosome-wide dosage compensation and balance between the sexes in somatic tissues, including the Neo-X region. Consistent with ISCH predictions, neither the ancestral Shared-X nor the Neo-X is depleted of genes that are sensitive to RNAi-based expression disruption. However, contrary to expectations, at the level of individual genes, we find little evidence that more sensitive genes exhibit reduced expression divergence. These results suggest that chromosome-wide compensation can be maintained by global regulatory mechanisms that persist through sex chromosome turnover, even when gene-by-gene constraints are weak. Understanding the molecular basis of these mechanisms remains a central challenge in sex chromosome evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.