ArticleRemote sensing2026
An Open and Transferable Deep Learning Framework for Mapping Urban Tree Canopy Using NAIP Imagery.
Article in Remote sensing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The urban tree canopy is an important resource that spans public and private property and whose form and quantity change over short distances. Although remote sensing and deep learning approaches have been used to map urban tree canopy, the high cost of commercial imagery and the technical complexity of model development have limited their adoption by urban forestry practitioners. We developed a structured and reproducible deep learning workflow optimized for freely available USDA National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. The workflow incorporates a reproducible U-Net segmentation model for canopy delineation and a YOLOv9e object detection model for individual tree identification, enabling complementary estimation of the canopy extent and individual tree locations. Across two neighborhoods in Los Angeles, the optimized U-Net achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.824 for canopy segmentation, while YOLOv9e reached an F1-score of 0.687 for individual tree detection on a held-out test set with 17,466 annotated trees. A data sufficiency experiment showed that model performance stabilizes when approximately 130 trees are annotated per 320 × 320 pixel (px) tile, corresponding to about 25,379 training and 2641 validation labels, providing a practical target for annotation effort. Additional experiments demonstrate a structured workflow for spatial sampling, training data requirements, and the use of model inferences to estimate tree canopy extent and individual tree locations. The workflow also shows encouraging evidence of transferability to previously unseen urban areas without retraining. By relying solely on NAIP-optimized approaches, this new workflow bridges the gap between complex deep learning techniques and the practical needs of urban foresters; empowers local stakeholders to create accurate, affordable, and timely urban tree inventories; and fosters data-driven decision-making for the sustainable management of urban green infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.