Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663010›Full record

ArticleIEEE intelligent systems

Cross-Species Behavioral Analysis via Multidimensional Knowledge Transfer.

Yang Liu, Luke Shaw, Haotian Liu, Kuan Hong Wang, Feng Vankee-Lin, Guoying Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE intelligent systems. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang LiuUniversity of Oulu, 90570, Oulu, Finland, and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2157-0080
Luke ShawUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3886-9740
Haotian LiuUniversity of Oulu, 90570, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2872-4740
Kuan Hong WangUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2249-5417
Feng Vankee-LinStanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA, and VA Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1945-0362
Guoying ZhaoELLIS Institute Finland, 02150, Espoo, Finland, and University of Oulu, 90570, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3694-206X

Funding

U24 NEW Brain Aging Diversity SupplementU24AG072701 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CONWELL, YEATES, LIN, FENG VANKEE · 2021 to 2024
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision tools can provide objective, reproducible, and scalable measurements for understanding animal behaviors, which is a fundamental challenge in cross-species research. Existing approaches primarily emphasize body detection and tracking, with limited advancement in integrative behavioral pattern analysis due to sparse annotations and substantial variability in species' physical and cognitive traits. In this article, we conduct two pilot studies for cross-species behavioral analysis within primates using multidimensional transfer learning. First, prior knowledge of physiological similarities between humans and monkeys is introduced to adjust the representation learning for macaque facial expression classification under limited labeled data. Second, we improve our approach by leveraging the foundation model and self-supervised strategy to mitigate appearance variations across primate species for downstream marmoset engagement level estimation. Experiments on public and private cross-primates datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, highlighting the potential of knowledge transfer to bridge the gap between species-specific behavioral analysis and generalizable models.

Identifiers

PMID42663010
PMCPMC13521619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.