ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2026
Microtensile bond strength of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and nanoceramic composite to normal and caries-affected dentin: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Modern caries management involves the removal of the carious dentin after selective removal of soft dentin while retaining the firm dentin and restoring with an appropriate restorative. Aim: To evaluate and compare the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of high-viscosity GC Glass Hybrid and Glass Ionomer FX Ultra cements with Ceram.x nanoceramic composite on normal dentin (ND) and artificially induced caries-affected dentin. Materials and Methods: After collecting 90 extracted human mandibular molar teeth, the occlusal enamel was removed. Vestibulolingually teeth were sectioned into two halves, in which the distal half samples ( Results: The mean μTBS of Ceram.x composite for both ND and ACD was significantly higher when compared to both high-viscosity glass ionomer cements (GICs) examined ( Conclusion: Caries-simulated dentin has substantially lower μTBS values than ND. The μTBS values of the two tested GICs were much lower than the mean bond strength of the nanocomposite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.